AI for mechanical engineering analysis · Machine-checked, not guessed

ForgePilot: AI for Mechanical Engineering Analysis, FMEA, Tolerance Stack-Up, GD&T Drawing Review, and Standards Compliance

Stop rebuilding your engineering analysis in a spreadsheet every revision.

FMEA, tolerance stack-ups, GD&T drawing review, and standards compliance, all done by AI and versioned to the exact file it ran against, not scattered across four different tools. Solo or with your whole team.

Works with whatever CAD you already export from, SolidWorks, Fusion 360, CATIA, NX, or none of the above. No plugin to install, no seat license, no IT procurement. Upload the file, get the analysis.

AerospaceRoboticsManufacturingStructuralStudent Projects
Analysis · 1.3s
ForgePilot

Prompt

Critical Finding

AR 14 flutter onset ≈ 23 m/s, below cruise. Design-limiting. Not a weight issue, an aeroelastic one.

Key Numbers

L/D: +18% at AR 10 vs AR 8. Root bending moment: 2.4× at AR 12. Spar mass penalty: +340 g per AR unit above 10.

Verdict

AR 10.5, T800 carbon spar, 3.1 mm wall. Validate flutter margin via FEA above 20 m/s.

AerospaceStructural AnalysisFEACAD ReviewRoboticsManufacturingFailure Mode RankingDFM FeedbackCFD TradeoffsMaterial SelectionThermal BudgetingFlutter PredictionFatigue LifeGD&TTolerance StacksKinematicsAerospaceStructural AnalysisFEACAD ReviewRoboticsManufacturingFailure Mode RankingDFM FeedbackCFD TradeoffsMaterial SelectionThermal BudgetingFlutter PredictionFatigue LifeGD&TTolerance StacksKinematics

Used by engineers and engineering students in aerospace, manufacturing, robotics, and coursework

0
Engineering tools, one workspace
0+
Engineering file formats
<2s
Avg. analysis time
Full session memory
Real, dated, not testimonials

What actually happened when we tested it

VERIFICATION CATCH
Jul 26, 2026

Asked a fatigue safety-factor question in plain chat. The AI's own written answer said 3.38. The independent verification engine recomputed it separately and got 2.53, the AI had forgotten to apply the stress concentration factor. Caught before it mattered.

CONTEXT CONTINUITY
Jul 27, 2026

Ran a drawing review, then asked for an FMEA, then a tolerance stack-up, all in the same thread. The FMEA cited the exact defects the drawing review flagged. The stack-up reused the same bore numbers. Zero re-uploading, zero re-explaining.

REAL BUG, REAL FIX
Jul 29, 2026

A real uploaded FMEA spreadsheet came back “corrupted or unreadable.” Root cause: .xlsx parsing was never actually wired up, it silently mangled the file. Fixed the same day. Bring your own templates now, they're read correctly.

See the full verification methodology, with the exact numbers →

Where ForgePilot started

FMEA is not a bolt-on feature here, it's the flagship

Most engineering-AI tools treat FMEA as an afterthought, if they touch it at all. ForgePilot was built around it: upload a design or describe it in plain English and get failure modes ranked by RPN, with a specific corrective action for each one, not a generic template you still have to fill in.

Try the FMEA Generator Free

Ranked, not listed

Severity × Occurrence × Detection, highest risk first, not alphabetical.

Specific, not generic

"Increase fillet radius to r ≥ 1.5mm", not "consider design improvements".

Cross-file, in seconds

Reads your CAD geometry, test logs, and spec sheets together in one pass.

Why ForgePilot

WhyengineerschooseForgePilot

Generic AI gives you information. ForgePilot gives you engineering judgment, inside a workspace built around your project.

Scenario
Generic AI
ForgePilot

You ask about a part failing

Lists all possible failure modes alphabetically

Ranks the 2-3 most probable failures by severity, tells you what to inspect first

You upload a CAD file

Describes what it sees visually

Identifies stress concentrations, thin walls, DFM issues, and manufacturability problems

You send test data (CSV, PDF)

Summarizes the data generically

Flags outliers, approaching limits, fatigue margins, and failure mode implications

You ask a follow-up

May lose context from earlier messages

Maintains full engineering context across the entire session

Core Capabilities

Builtformodernengineering

AI reasoning fused with deep engineering domain knowledge.

σ_yieldAnalysisFailure ⚠FEASF = 2.4 · FS_min

Numbers you can check, not a wall of text

Ranked failure modes, first-principles analysis, specific numbers, not directions. Root causes first. Always.

PDFSTLCSVSTEP

Upload Anything Technical

STL, STEP, PDF datasheets, CSV test logs, VTK simulation results, Abaqus .inp, GCode, up to 10 files at once. Exported from SolidWorks, Fusion, CATIA, or anything else, no plugin, no seat license required. Full cross-file analysis in a single prompt.

Upload thermal_data.csv847 rows · 6 columns · 3 outliers flaggedFatigue hotspot analysisσ_max = 412 MPa @ root fillet, criticalMaterial recommendationTi-6Al-4V · SF = 2.1 recommendedNext: FEA validation step→ Session continues

Machine-checked, not model-guessed

The 8 core calculators, tolerance stack-up, stress, pressure vessel, bolted joint, and more, run as deterministic math, not free-text generation. The AI explains the result; it doesn't invent the number.

ForgePilot · Engineering ReportSummaryAnalysisRecommendationsSave as PDFDownload .md

Engineering Report Generation

Export any session as a formatted engineering report, one click from conversation to structured PDF. Auto-formatted with summary, analysis, and recommendations.

σ_yieldAnalysisFailure ⚠FEASF = 2.4 · FS_min

One workspace, not five tools

6 AI agents and 8 calculators live in the same continuous thread as your chat: FMEA, tolerance stack-up, drawing review, standards compliance, and more. No switching apps, no re-uploading the same file to a different tool.

Upload thermal_data.csv847 rows · 6 columns · 3 outliers flaggedFatigue hotspot analysisσ_max = 412 MPa @ root fillet, criticalMaterial recommendationTi-6Al-4V · SF = 2.1 recommendedNext: FEA validation step→ Session continues

Built for teams, not just individuals

Shared team projects everyone can see, live member presence, comments on every analysis, and formal sign-off stamped by name and date, so review happens in the workspace, not over email.

Workflow

HowForgePilotworks

01

Ask or Upload

Type a question or attach any engineering file: CAD, PDF, STL, CSV, test data, GCode, or multiple files at once.

02

Analyze

First-principles reasoning. Ranked failure modes. Specific numbers, standards citations, not vague directions.

03

Iterate

Follow up naturally. Full session context maintained. No need to re-explain the problem or re-upload files.

04

Decide

Walk away with specific alloys, tolerances, process choices, or next testing steps, not just possibilities.

Every project stays exactly as you left it. Revise the design next week, and ForgePilot picks up from where you stopped, not from zero.

Industries

Builtfortechnicalteams

Aerospace

Aerospace

Robotics

Robotics

Manufacturing

Manufacturing

Automotive

Automotive

Industrial

Industrial

Ready when you are

Stop getting textbook answers.
Start engineering with AI.

Ranked insights, real numbers, engineering-specific reasoning, in every response, from the first message.

Your files are stored securely and only you (or your team) can access them, reusable across every analysis, from any device.